
A Though may will disturb many others.
Heritage Conservation is not necessarily authentic or fundamental within most
cultures and communities. The term is relatively new, when Prosper Mérimée was appointed in France
as the first Official Heritage Inspector in 1834. Earlier, efforts were either
religious or functional to maintain religious, public and private properties in
usable conditions. Between Eastern and Western principal epistemologies, the
necessity to keep the inherited properties as landmarks and witness on Humane
Civilization had to align to the depth of cultural referrals. Despite how physical
and beneficiary values are appreciated, others denounced it in favor of
spiritual and non-physical interpretations. This is how some monuments are been
funded to stay standing, and others are lift to collapse by decay or demolished
for livable necessities to replace. Initiatives and advocacies to prevent
heritage demolition are symptoms of societal intelligence, not bureaucratic
one. This is another episode of Urban Democracy that most societies aren't aware, or have apatite for..!
قد يُثير هذا الرأي استياء الكثيرين
لا يُعدّ الحفاظ على التراث بالضرورة أمرًا أصيلًا أو جوهريًا في معظم الثقافات والمجتمعات. فالمصطلح حديث نسبيًا، إذ يعود إلى تعيين بروسبير ميريميه في فرنسا كأول مفتش رسمي للتراث عام 1834. في السابق، كانت الجهود إما دينية أو وظيفية للحفاظ على الممتلكات الدينية والعامة والخاصة في حالة صالحة للاستخدام. وبين النظريات المعرفية الشرقية والغربية، كان لا بد من مواءمة ضرورة الحفاظ على الممتلكات الموروثة كمعالم وشاهد على الحضارة الإنسانية مع عمق المراجع الثقافية. ورغم تقدير القيم المادية والنفعية، فقد استنكرها آخرون لصالح التفسيرات الروحية وغير المادية. هكذا يتم تمويل بعض المعالم لتبقى قائمة، بينما تُرفع أخرى لتنهار بفعل التلف أو تُهدم لإفساح المجال أمام الضروريات المعيشية. إن المبادرات والدعوات الرامية إلى منع هدم التراث هي دليل على ذكاء المجتمع، لا على دوافع بيروقراطية. هذه حلقة أخرى من حلقات الديمقراطية الحضرية التي لا تدركها معظم المجتمعات، أو لا ترغب بها!
McKinsey & Company’s The State of Organizations 2026 is the second edition of a report that is absolutely essential reading for HR leaders.
Based on a global survey of more than 10,000 executives, it argues that three tectonic forces are reshaping organisations: (1) the infusion of technology, (2) intensifying economic and geopolitical uncertainty, and (3) deep workforce shifts. In turn, these forces are driving nine shifts:
Technology Disruption
1️⃣ Unlocking the AI-enabled organisation
2️⃣ Humans and AI agents: Building a new world of collaboration
3️⃣ Leveraging AI to rewrite the future of shared services
Economic Disruption
4️⃣ Finding value in a new geopolitical context
5️⃣ From structure to flow: Reaching the next productivity frontier
6️⃣ Focusing on the core: Doing the right thing with more intensity
Workforce shifts
7️⃣ Aiming high with a new performance edge
8️⃣ Sharpening the focus on diversity and inclusion
9️⃣ Reinventing leadership: Leading from the inside out
For HR, the implications are profound. The report reinforces that sustained performance now depends on capability, culture, and disciplined execution.
This is reflected in interviews in the report with CHROs Bettina Dietsche (Allianz), Lorena Dellagiovanna (Hitachi), Sarah Armstrong (Rolls Royce), Charise LE (Schneider Electric), and Tiffanie Boyd (McDonalds).
Finally, the report identifies four implications for organisational transformation: treat change as continuous, keep people and culture at the core, recognise that AI reshapes how change is delivered, and define a clear target state with a credible path to achieve it.
Kudos to the authors: Dana Maor, Alexis Krivkovich, Dr. Patrick Guggenberger, Damian Klingler and Michael Anzenhofer with contributors including Sandra Durth, who I had the delight of speaking with recently on many of the themes in this report in an episode of the Digital HR Leaders podcast.
🔗 The report is featured in the February edition of the Data Driven HR Monthly, which you can access here: https://lnkd.in/e-WP7Czi 🔗