احفظ البوست وذاكر كل نقطه لو انت في منصب اداري
Monday, June 10, 2024
أدوات وقواعد إدارية
History of Whistleblowing
The History of Whistleblowing
Whistleblowing, the act of exposing illicit activities within an organization, has a long and storied history. It involves individuals who risk their careers, and sometimes their personal safety, to bring attention to wrongdoing. This article explores the evolution of whistleblowing, its notable cases, and the legal frameworks that have developed to protect whistleblowers.
Early Instances of Whistleblowing
Ancient Rome
The concept of whistleblowing dates back to Ancient Rome. The Lex Papia Poppaea, enacted in 9 AD, encouraged citizens to report corruption and fraud within the government. Whistleblowers, known as "delators," were often rewarded with a portion of the penalties imposed on the wrongdoers .
The Middle Ages
During the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church played a significant role in encouraging whistleblowing. The church's canon law required members to report any immoral behavior, especially among the clergy. The church provided mechanisms to protect the anonymity of informants to prevent retaliation .
Whistleblowing in Modern History
The United States
The False Claims Act (1863)
One of the earliest examples of modern whistleblowing legislation is the United States' False Claims Act, enacted during the Civil War in 1863. This act, also known as the "Lincoln Law," was designed to combat fraud by suppliers to the Union Army. It allowed private individuals to sue on behalf of the government and receive a portion of any recovered damages, thereby incentivizing whistleblowing .
Pentagon Papers (1971)
A landmark case in American history is that of Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers in 1971. These documents revealed that the U.S. government had systematically lied about the Vietnam War's progress. Ellsberg's actions sparked a nationwide debate on government transparency and the public's right to know, leading to increased protections for whistleblowers .
Watergate Scandal (1972-1974)
Another pivotal moment was the Watergate scandal, where "Deep Throat," later revealed to be FBI Associate Director Mark Felt, provided crucial information to journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. This information led to President Richard Nixon's resignation and underscored the vital role whistleblowers play in maintaining governmental integrity .
United Kingdom
The Public Interest Disclosure Act (1998)
In the UK, the Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA) of 1998 marked a significant development. The act provides legal protection for employees who expose wrongdoing within their organizations, including criminal offenses, environmental damage, and health and safety violations. PIDA aimed to create a culture of openness and accountability within workplaces .
Global Perspective
International Organizations
International bodies such as the United Nations and the European Union have also recognized the importance of whistleblowing. The UN Convention Against Corruption, adopted in 2003, encourages member states to establish protections for whistleblowers to combat corruption more effectively. Similarly, the EU's Whistleblower Protection Directive, adopted in 2019, sets minimum standards for whistleblower protections across member states .
Corporate Whistleblowing
In the corporate world, whistleblowing has become an essential mechanism for ensuring ethical conduct. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in the United States, enacted in response to financial scandals such as Enron and WorldCom, includes provisions to protect whistleblowers who report financial misconduct. This act has been instrumental in promoting transparency and accountability in corporate governance .
From uncovering governmental, military, and police corruption to publicizing safety issues at nuclear power plants, countless whistleblowers have risked their livelihoods, and sometimes their lives, to alert the public to dangerous secrets.
Read on to find out how famous whistleblowers have changed U.S. law and society with their brave and often controversial actions.
What is a whistleblower?
A whistleblower is an employee of an organization who reports abuse, fraud, corruption, and/or dangers to public health and safety. Whistleblowers often turn to public reporting after attempts to report internally fail.
While the term “whistleblower” did not come into common usage until the 1970s, insiders have been reporting abuse as long as humans have had organizations and governments.
The First American Whistleblowers
The first American whistleblowers emerged in concert with our nation’s founding: in 1777, when a group of ten naval officers alerted the Continental Congress to abuses by Commodore Esek Hopkins, including torture of British POWs during the Revolutionary War.
When the Continental Congress dismissed Commodore Hopkins, he retaliated with a libel suit; two of the whistleblowers, Midshipman Samuel Shaw and First Lieutenant Richard Marven, were jailed. Shaw and Marven appealed to the Continental Congress for help, who, as a result, enacted the world’s first whistleblower protection law on July 30, 1777.
From the earliest moments in U.S. history, attorneys have also played a key role in shaping whistleblower laws. Attorneys defending whistleblowers from retaliation have advanced case law throughout U.S. history, including several Supreme Court cases which extended whistleblower protections to private industries that affect public health, safety, and security.
While protections for whistleblowers have waxed and waned throughout U.S. history, their effect on society has been profound. The actions of the ten whistleblowers below – and hundreds more that we can’t fit on this list – have led to major cultural and political shifts, new safety regulations in dangerous industries, and increased awareness of the role of policing, intelligence, and surveillance in society.
Most Famous Whistleblowers in U.S. History
10. Mark Whitacre
In 1992 the corporate vice president of Archer Daniel Midland visited the FBI with some potentially damaging information about the company. Mark Whitacre – the subject of the 2009 film The Informant! – soon teamed up with the FBI for a three-year undercover operation to expose the company’s price fixing scheme. While Whitacre may have been given immunity from actions during his time at the company, he was certainly accountable for the $9 million he embezzled during his 3 years undercover. In the end, Whitacre was sentenced to 9 years in federal prison for those actions, while the longest sentence given to an ADM employee – for the crimes Whitacre brought attention to – was 30 months. Both citizens and government officials have sought a Presidential pardon for Whitacre for nearly two decades.
9. Vera English
While working as a lab technician at a nuclear facility operated by General Electric in 1984, Vera English was alarmed by the frequency of radioactive spillages. English contacted both her supervisor and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission about her concerns, but nothing was done and English was fired shortly after. After a long legal battle, her Supreme Court case, English v. General Electric Company, set a precedent that allowed whistleblowers to pursue cases under state law. English’s landmark victory also set precedent for the use of whistleblower protection laws in other nuclear energy cases, and demonstrated how existing whistleblower laws can be used to protect against corporate retaliation.
Whistleblowing
On a nutshell, the whistleblowing has many cultural, ethical and social taboos, which don't make it favorable. Since down of history, very few persons were either brave or "insane" to voluntarily come forward notifying on conspiracies, malpractices, or hush-money.. Legal systems had tried, and still do to protect the whistleblowers against retaliations, backlash or the stigmatization.. Bureaucrats, politicians and media-blowers often work together to undermine any attempts to expose corruption and injustice or beneficiaries.. Snowden, Assange and Manning are few of the currently labeled and still confront various retaliations.. Certainly, it is genuine component in the strive for governance and quality practice.. It should be advocated through education, media, and legal systems.. What's about kick start by NGOs and Professional Governing bodies..??
باختصار، إن الإبلاغ عن المخالفات فيه الكثير من المحرمات الثقافية والأخلاقية والاجتماعية، التي لا تجعله محبذاً. منذ بداية التاريخ، كان عدد قليل جدًا من الأشخاص إما شجعانًا أو "مجانين" للتقدم طوعًا للإخطار عن المؤامرات أو الممارسات الخاطئة أو أموال الصمت. وقد حاولت الأنظمة القانونية، ولا تزال تفعل ذلك، حماية المبلغين عن المخالفات من الأعمال الانتقامية أو ردود الفعل العنيفة أو الوصم. .. غالبًا ما يعمل البيروقراطيون والسياسيون والمبلغون الإعلاميون معًا لتقويض أي محاولات لفضح الفساد والظلم أو المستفيدين.. سنودن وأسانج ومانينغ هم عدد قليل من المصنفين حاليًا وما زالوا يواجهون عمليات انتقامية مختلفة.. ومن المؤكد أنه عنصر حقيقي في السعي من أجل الحوكمة وممارسات الجودة.. ينبغي الدعوة إليها من خلال التعليم والإعلام والأنظمة القانونية.. ماذا عن البداية من قبل المنظمات غير الحكومية وهيئات الإدارة المهنية..؟؟
برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات: حماية النزاهة ومواجهة التحديات
Whistleblower Programs: Safeguarding Integrity, Facing Challenges
Introduction
Whistleblower programs are crucial mechanisms designed to uncover and address unethical, illegal, or harmful activities within organizations. By offering protection and incentives to individuals who report wrongdoing, these programs aim to promote transparency, accountability, and integrity across various sectors. Despite their importance, whistleblower programs face numerous challenges that can hinder their effectiveness. This article explores the structure and significance of whistleblower programs, highlights notable examples, and delves into the challenges they encounter.
The Structure and Significance of Whistleblower Programs
Whistleblower programs are typically established by governmental bodies, regulatory agencies, or within corporations to encourage employees and other insiders to report misconduct. These programs often provide:
- Confidentiality: Ensuring the whistleblower's identity is protected to prevent retaliation.
- Protection from Retaliation: Legal safeguards against job loss, demotion, or other forms of retribution.
- Monetary Rewards: Financial incentives for information leading to significant enforcement actions or penalties.
Examples of Whistleblower Programs:
- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Whistleblower Program: Established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, it has awarded hundreds of millions of dollars to whistleblowers since its inception .
- The European Union Whistleblower Protection Directive: Mandates that all EU member states implement national laws to protect whistleblowers and ensure proper channels for reporting misconduct .
- The Whistleblower Protection Act in India: Offers protection to individuals exposing corruption in government and public sector organizations, though its implementation has faced criticism for inadequacy .
Key Challenges Facing Whistleblower Programs
Fear of Retaliation: Despite legal protections, many potential whistleblowers remain reluctant to come forward due to fear of retaliation. This includes threats to their career, personal safety, and financial stability .
Lack of Awareness and Trust: Many employees are either unaware of whistleblower programs or distrust their efficacy. Building a culture of transparency and trust within organizations is essential for these programs to be successful .
Insufficient Legal Protections: In some regions, legal frameworks for whistleblower protection are either weak or poorly enforced. This inadequacy can result in insufficient protection, leaving whistleblowers vulnerable to reprisals .
Cultural Barriers: In certain cultures, loyalty to the organization and hierarchical respect can deter individuals from reporting misconduct. Overcoming these cultural barriers is crucial for the effectiveness of whistleblower programs .
Inadequate Handling of Reports: There have been instances where organizations fail to act on whistleblower reports promptly and effectively. Ensuring a robust and transparent process for investigating and addressing reported issues is critical .
Conclusion
Whistleblower programs play an indispensable role in promoting ethical behavior and accountability within organizations. While they offer significant benefits, the challenges they face must be addressed to enhance their effectiveness. This requires a multi-faceted approach, including strengthening legal protections, fostering a supportive organizational culture, and ensuring that whistleblower reports are handled with the utmost seriousness and confidentiality. By doing so, society can better protect those who courageously speak out against wrongdoing, ultimately fostering a more transparent and just environment.
برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات: حماية النزاهة ومواجهة التحديات
مقدمة
تعد برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات آليات حاسمة مصممة لكشف ومعالجة الأنشطة غير الأخلاقية أو غير القانونية أو الضارة داخل المنظمات. ومن خلال توفير الحماية والحوافز للأفراد الذين يبلغون عن المخالفات، تهدف هذه البرامج إلى تعزيز الشفافية والمساءلة والنزاهة في مختلف القطاعات. على الرغم من أهميتها، تواجه برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات العديد من التحديات التي يمكن أن تعيق فعاليتها. يستكشف هذا المقال هيكل وأهمية برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات، ويسلط الضوء على الأمثلة البارزة، ويتعمق في التحديات التي يواجهونها.
هيكل وأهمية برامج المبلغين
عادةً ما يتم إنشاء برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات من قبل الهيئات الحكومية أو الهيئات التنظيمية أو داخل الشركات لتشجيع الموظفين وغيرهم من المطلعين على الإبلاغ عن سوء السلوك. غالبًا ما توفر هذه البرامج ما يلي:
السرية: ضمان حماية هوية المبلغين عن المخالفات لمنع الانتقام.
الحماية من الانتقام: ضمانات قانونية ضد فقدان الوظيفة أو خفض الرتبة أو غيرها من أشكال الانتقام.
المكافآت المالية: حوافز مالية للحصول على معلومات تؤدي إلى إجراءات إنفاذية أو عقوبات كبيرة.
أمثلة على برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات
(SEC):برنامج المبلغين عن المخالفات التابع لهيئة الأوراق المالية والبورصة الأمريكية
تم إنشاؤه بموجب قانون دود-فرانك لإصلاح وول ستريت وحماية المستهلك، وقد منح مئات الملايين من الدولارات للمبلغين عن المخالفات منذ إنشائه.
توجيه الاتحاد الأوروبي لحماية المبلغين عن المخالفات: ينص على أن تقوم جميع الدول الأعضاء في الاتحاد الأوروبي بتنفيذ القوانين الوطنية لحماية المبلغين عن المخالفات وضمان القنوات المناسبة للإبلاغ عن سوء السلوك.
قانون حماية المبلغين عن المخالفات في الهند: يوفر الحماية للأفراد الذين يكشفون الفساد في مؤسسات الحكومة والقطاع العام، على الرغم من أن تنفيذه واجه انتقادات لعدم كفايته.
التحديات الرئيسية التي تواجه برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات
الخوف من الانتقام: على الرغم من الحماية القانونية، لا يزال العديد من المبلغين المحتملين مترددين في التقدم بسبب الخوف من الانتقام. وهذا يشمل التهديدات التي تهدد حياتهم المهنية وسلامتهم الشخصية واستقرارهم المالي.
نقص الوعي والثقة: العديد من الموظفين إما لا يعرفون برامج الإبلاغ عن المخالفات أو لا يثقون في فعاليتها. إن بناء ثقافة الشفافية والثقة داخل المنظمات أمر ضروري لنجاح هذه البرامج.
الحماية القانونية غير كافية: في بعض المناطق، تكون الأطر القانونية لحماية المبلغين عن المخالفات إما ضعيفة أو ضعيفة التنفيذ. ويمكن أن يؤدي هذا القصور إلى عدم كفاية الحماية، مما يجعل المبلغين عن المخالفات عرضة للانتقام.
الحواجز الثقافية: في بعض الثقافات، يمكن للولاء للمنظمة والاحترام الهرمي أن يمنع الأفراد من الإبلاغ عن سوء السلوك. إن التغلب على هذه الحواجز الثقافية أمر بالغ الأهمية لفعالية برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات.
التعامل غير المناسب مع التقارير: كانت هناك حالات فشلت فيها المنظمات في التصرف بشأن تقارير المبلغين عن المخالفات بسرعة وفعالية. إن ضمان وجود عملية قوية وشفافة للتحقيق في القضايا المبلغ عنها ومعالجتها أمر بالغ الأهمية.
خاتمة
تلعب برامج المبلغين عن المخالفات دورًا لا غنى عنه في تعزيز السلوك الأخلاقي والمساءلة داخل المنظمات. ورغم أنها توفر فوائد كبيرة، إلا أنه يجب معالجة التحديات التي تواجهها لتعزيز فعاليتها. ويتطلب ذلك اتباع نهج متعدد الأوجه، بما في ذلك تعزيز الحماية القانونية، وتعزيز الثقافة التنظيمية الداعمة، وضمان التعامل مع تقارير المبلغين عن المخالفات بأقصى قدر من الجدية والسرية. ومن خلال القيام بذلك، يمكن للمجتمع أن يوفر حماية أفضل لأولئك الذين يتحدثون بشجاعة ضد المخالفات، مما يؤدي في نهاية المطاف إلى تعزيز بيئة أكثر شفافية وعدالة.
References
- "Whistleblower Protections in Practice." National Whistleblower Center, 2023.
- "Legal Safeguards for Whistleblowers: An International Perspective." Transparency International, 2022.
- "Building Trust in Whistleblower Programs." Harvard Business Review, 2021.
- "Challenges in Implementing Whistleblower Protections in India." Economic Times, 2023.
- "Whistleblower Awareness and Organizational Culture." Journal of Business Ethics, 2020.
- "The European Union Whistleblower Protection Directive." European Commission, 2019.
- "SEC Whistleblower Program: Impact and Statistics." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2023.
- "Cultural Barriers to Whistleblowing." Journal of International Business Studies, 2021.
Saturday, June 8, 2024
US$1.4 billion in annual GGR
CBRE: Wynn’s UAE resort could generate almost US$1.4 billion in annual GGR
by Ben Blaschke
A US$4 billion integrated resort being developed by Wynn Resorts on Al Marjan Island in the United Arab Emirates is seen generating gross gaming revenues of US$1.38 billion annually, with net revenues reaching US$1.8 billion, according to a new report by CBRE Institutional Research.
The report, titled “United Arab Emirates: The next gaming frontier”, also outlines CBRE’s expectation that the property in Ras Al Khaimah should ramp quickly given the current lack of gaming supply in the region.
According to analysts John DeCree, Colin Mansfield, Connor Parks and Max Marsh, Wynn Resorts can expect to generated free cash flow of around US$356 million by 2030, calculated on its 40% equity contribution and management contract. Property EBITDARM (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization, Rent, and Management Fees) is estimated at US$921 million annually.
“We can’t help but get more bullish upon returning from our trip [to the UAE],” the analysts wrote, adding that they expect Wynn’s property to stabilize within three years.
“However, it could be much quicker. We have seen first-to-market properties like Marina Bay Sands and Sands Macao ramp much quicker given the historical lack of gaming supply in those markets.”
CBRE has also estimated the total addressable market for GGR in the UAE at US$8.5 billion, while a base case in which three IRs are developed – potentially one each in Abu Dhabi, Dubai, and Ras Al Khaimah – is pegged at US$6 billion annually.
“With a population of 9.7mm people (~88% expats), a robust tourism industry with ~25mm annual visitors and a high propensity to spend, virtually no gaming competition in the region, and an expectation for an operator-friendly regulatory regime, the UAE presents one of the best IR investment opportunities we have seen in a long time,” the analysts said.
The report also highlights the significance of margins, describing margin potential as the “more under-appreciated” part of the UAE story.
“We have seen consensus forming in the mid-30% property margin range for Wynn Al Marjan Island and other IRs in the UAE,” it states. “However, with an expected tax rate and regulatory regime that would rival Singapore and Las Vegas, relatively favorable labor conditions (compared with quotas in Macau and unions in Las Vegas), and virtually no competition, we would expect operating margins to be more akin to Singapore (50% range) than Las Vegas.”
Ben Blaschke
A former sports journalist in Sydney, Australia, Ben has been Managing Editor of Inside Asian Gaming since early 2016. He played a leading role in developing and launching IAG Breakfast Briefing in April 2017 and oversees as well as being a key contributor to all of IAG’s editorial pursuits.
https://www.asgam.com/index.php/2024/06/06/cbre-wynns-uae-resort-could-generate-almost-us1-4-billion-in-annual-ggr/
Monday, June 3, 2024
An Error, or a Decline..?
The key characteristic of the developing countries is their hyper real estate dreams, projects and transactions. Yet, mostly experiencing massive problems due to late identification of wrong planning, funds and/or operations.
The following would summarize the standard case, which would slightly change on features, yet consistent in core and seeds:
1. Rapid Developments; which are either to supply, anaesthetize, or hypnotize the stressed public.
2. Troubled or invalidity competences of assigned planning and delivery teams, where as basis of knowledge, professionalism and skills are questioned.
3. Immature, powerless, speechless, ineffective governing bodies and NGOs, which are the true guardians of urbanity.
4. General disintegrated governments, authorities and stakeholders, who should mastermind the urban planning and delivery activities.
This is why wrong urban delivery shall not be an error, but a decline..!!